home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.interpath.net!softbase
- From: softbase@mercury.interpath.com (Scott McMahan - Softbase Systems)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: Visual C++ V4.0 vs Borland C++ V5.0
- Date: 18 Apr 1996 13:13:13 GMT
- Organization: Interpath -- Providing Internet access to North Carolina
- Message-ID: <4l5f59$9tf@news.interpath.net>
- References: <Dq0z9w.Ir.0.queen@torfree.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: mercury.interpath.com
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Alexander Kolomietz (ad177@torfree.net) wrote:
- : Any ideas where to find information how these two products related to
- : each other, what are their adantages and disadvantagies?
-
- I think the disadvantages outweigh anything else -- most Borland 5.0
- users seem very disappointed with the product (I know I am), and
- Visual C++ -- well, enough said.
-
- : I heard that Visual C++ 4.0 works only under Windows 95 or Window NT
- : does it compile for 16-bit Windows and DOS?
-
- Visual C++ quit working in 16-bit Windows and DOS with version 2!
- That's old news. Borland and some of the others still support all
- environments from the same compiler.
-
- Scott
-
-